Proud fans of a 128-year old tradition

It is currently Tue Sep 02, 2014 3:47 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:41 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3364
Location: Wheeling, WV
I would ask why it is fair to assess LaRoche as of little value because he doesn't hit in the first half? Jack has done well from July to July but to suggest that he is one of the best offensive players in baseball is way over the line. The stat guys on this board could easily point out that his life time batting average does no rank him even in the top half of hitters, maybe acceptable for SS but again not near the best.

In fact he is a .270 hitter life time. If that makes him one of the best in baseball, we need to eliminate the mound altogether.

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar
 WWW  YIM  Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 7:24 pm
Posts: 4151
Location: Zelienople, PA
Don't be putting words in peoples mouths. No one said he was one of the best in baseball. I said he was one of the best between July of last year, and now, and that might be worth a whole lot in trade talks.\\

ZM

_________________
Someone tell Votto... rbis are good


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:52 am 
Substitute2 wrote:
I would ask why it is fair to assess LaRoche as of little value because he doesn't hit in the first half? Jack has done well from July to July but to suggest that he is one of the best offensive players in baseball is way over the line. The stat guys on this board could easily point out that his life time batting average does no rank him even in the top half of hitters, maybe acceptable for SS but again not near the best.

In fact he is a .270 hitter life time. If that makes him one of the best in baseball, we need to eliminate the mound altogether.


LaRoche would be a good chip to trade for a team that wants an extra bat to help down the stretch. I don't think any team will trade for him that wants a regular year-round first baseman. He's proven he can't hit all year. My question is, will they get much for a guy who will be only a help for 2 months?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 12:47 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:28 pm
Posts: 2170
I want matt kemp.

_________________
0 straight losing seasons


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 1:19 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3364
Location: Wheeling, WV
Is Kemp single or married?

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 2:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 8:20 pm
Posts: 517
Location: Brighton & Hove, UK
matt kemp sucks!

_________________
Conversation should be pleasant without scurrility, witty without affectation, free without indecency, learned without conceitedness, novel without falsehood. - William Shakespeare


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 3:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:17 pm
Posts: 1163
I just want to know where we play him. Getting Matt Kemp gives the Bucs Nady, Bay, McClouth, and Kemp, with AM waiting in AAA.

5 good outfielders for 3 spots. Unless they have something cooking for Bay or Nady, this deal makes no sense.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:02 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 4:26 pm
Posts: 3006
Jeremy wrote:
I just want to know where we play him. Getting Matt Kemp gives the Bucs Nady, Bay, McClouth, and Kemp, with AM waiting in AAA.

5 good outfielders for 3 spots. Unless they have something cooking for Bay or Nady, this deal makes no sense.


When you are a team in the Pirates position, you don't worry about stuff like that. You acquire the best talent available, regardless of need. Then, trade your surplus to fill other holes.

Having said that, I will dread coming to this board if we get Kemp. Don't get me wrong, I like Kemp, but the disdain that some people have around here for strikeouts...sheesh. I bet we have 10 posts a day about how Kemp sucks because he strikes out too much.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:17 pm
Posts: 1163
BBF wrote:
Jeremy wrote:
I just want to know where we play him. Getting Matt Kemp gives the Bucs Nady, Bay, McClouth, and Kemp, with AM waiting in AAA.

5 good outfielders for 3 spots. Unless they have something cooking for Bay or Nady, this deal makes no sense.


When you are a team in the Pirates position, you don't worry about stuff like that. You acquire the best talent available, regardless of need. Then, trade your surplus to fill other holes.

Having said that, I will dread coming to this board if we get Kemp. Don't get me wrong, I like Kemp, but the disdain that some people have around here for strikeouts...sheesh. I bet we have 10 posts a day about how Kemp sucks because he strikes out too much.


But then we run the risk of being the Washington Nats.....loaded at one position and thin everywhere else.

I just like some of the kids they have more than Kemp.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:35 pm 
The Pirates are in last place. They need to get as many good players at as many positions as possible.

As BBF said, you don't decline the opportunity to acquire a good player because you have "too much" talent at a position. You get the best players possible, and then maneuver from there.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:23 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:46 am
Posts: 3575
Location: Economy, PA
Jack is an above average player who has played well recently, therefore he has significant trade value.

LaRoche is a below average player who has played very poorly recently, therefore he has little trade value.

If Kemp is deemed to be a good return for Wilson, I wouldn't let a surplus of outfielders stop me from making the trade. Bay and Nady will likely both be traded, which will take care of that problem.

I would, however, worry about the fact that we would not have a shortstop. We would have to get one somewhere, even if it's just a defense-only guy as a short term solution.

I would hate to have to watch Rivas or Bixler or even Gomez continue to butcher the position. That drags the whole defense down.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:17 pm
Posts: 1163
Elmer wrote:
The Pirates are in last place. They need to get as many good players at as many positions as possible.

As BBF said, you don't decline the opportunity to acquire a good player because you have "too much" talent at a position. You get the best players possible, and then maneuver from there.


Assuming you can. I just take what I read about this being a pretty thin trade market and go from there.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 6:52 pm 
Jeremy wrote:
Elmer wrote:
The Pirates are in last place. They need to get as many good players at as many positions as possible.

As BBF said, you don't decline the opportunity to acquire a good player because you have "too much" talent at a position. You get the best players possible, and then maneuver from there.


Assuming you can. I just take what I read about this being a pretty thin trade market and go from there.


Worst case scenario, you have one hell of a bat on your bench. There is no downside to acquiring good players.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 8:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu May 08, 2008 9:17 pm
Posts: 1163
Elmer wrote:
Jeremy wrote:
Elmer wrote:
The Pirates are in last place. They need to get as many good players at as many positions as possible.

As BBF said, you don't decline the opportunity to acquire a good player because you have "too much" talent at a position. You get the best players possible, and then maneuver from there.


Assuming you can. I just take what I read about this being a pretty thin trade market and go from there.


Worst case scenario, you have one hell of a bat on your bench. There is no downside to acquiring good players.


And you have a black hole at short. All I'm saying is that this seems to be one of those deals that gets flipped a few days later.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Mon Jul 07, 2008 10:55 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 1:13 pm
Posts: 31
we need pitching guys...Oakland put Crosby on the DL and he's been slumping...trade Jack and Nady to the A's for Blanton or Hardin...

why not ask the dodgers for pitching?...I'd take Kershaw...then again we got to do something about the plethora of average at best lefthanders on this team!


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:09 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:10 pm
Posts: 2150
mr. crawdad wrote:
we need pitching guys...Oakland put Crosby on the DL and he's been slumping...trade Jack and Nady to the A's for Blanton or Hardin...

why not ask the dodgers for pitching?...I'd take Kershaw...then again we got to do something about the plethora of average at best lefthanders on this team!


Definitely have to think they are going to ask for pitching when working out any trades. Unfortunately I don't see your two scenarios working. The Dodgers are not trading Kershaw, especially for anything we'd offer them. He didn't fair so well when he was called up, but remember he was coming from AA and I believe is only 20 years old. I'd say he is an untouchable in their system. As for the A's thing...please not Blanton. He is what we already have a lot of...average on a good day. Harden I would love but you'd have to be nuts to trade for him considering he gets injured about 3 times per year. He is a hard thrower(Cy Young potential when healthy). I just can't imagine the Pirates would take the risk. I have heard his name mentioned as possibly being available.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 2:18 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:44 pm
Posts: 10582
Matt Kemp is a classic "high ceiling" player because of his physical tools. He is big, with huge power, yet runs well enough to play CF and steal 20 bases. He also a tremendous. arm - teams just do not run on him any more.

But . . . his knowledge of the strike zone is non-existent. Major league teams know this and throw fastballs just off the outside corner, breaking balls down and away, etc. Kemp keeps swinging. When a pitcher makes a mistake to Kemp, and his bat connects, he will drive the ball.

He is going to be prone to really bad slumps due to his problems recognizing the strike zone and his propensity for the K. I actually like Ethier better as a hitter. He looks like a 20 HR, 35 2B, .300 average, .375 OBP guy who will be a solid middle of the order hitter. Less "upside" potential than Kemp, but his bust potential is about 1/10th of that for Kemp.

JMO.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 3:03 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2008 4:14 pm
Posts: 13
Ethier's already 26, though. Kemp is 23. Ethier has had basically the same season three years in a row. He pretty much is what he is at this point. He's certainly better than the Jody Gerut-Ty Wigginton type of players Dave Littlefield would pursue, but he's the same kind of low-upside player.

Star-quality talent is what the Pirates need, and Kemp has it. You're right about him having a bigger chance of busting than Ethier, but I think that's a chance the Pirates need to take if they can. I think his problems with plate discipline may be real, but that you overstate them. He's had very high batting averages in both the minors and the majors - consistently, so not in a fluky way - and he has a career .300 BA in the majors, with a .342 OBP. While that's certainly an area he could improve, it's not like some huge Francoeur red flag.

In other words, I don't think the plate discipline issue is as likely to be his undoing as you seem to think. It's okay, and he still posts those very high batting averages. When a hitter has a well-rounded set of other skills, the walks will often come as he ages - think Sammy Sosa, or maybe Chili Davis (Kemp's PECOTA comparables list contains both those players).

I think Kemp's upside is, say, a couple notches worse than Vlad Guerrero. I mean, I think he could be really, really, really good. I'm not saying he'll reach his full potential, but I do think you can't let Andre Ethier get in the way of a player like that.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 10:41 am 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 3:45 pm
Posts: 1296
Location: Bowie, Md
Look, Jack is my favorite player on the team and I don't want to see him go, but, if he could bring talent in return then I could go for it. That said, I don't think we blow our wad so-to-speak to aquire free swinging Kemp. I have read on other boards that we should throw in Bay, throw in Nady... Why? The Dodgers are desperate for a SS and we hold the leverage. Jack Wilson is extremely valuable to this team as evident by his absence, plus, his salary is well within the range for quality shortstops. Nutting has already said that his salary is not an issue.

Sounds to me like Nutting and NH are agreeing with Elmer, BH, and others where they aren't interested in blowing up the team. Trading Jack would "blow" up the team, there is nobody to replace him, and it would give indication that the Pirates are giving up. I say, offer Jack Wilson to the Dodgers for Kemp, Hu, and McDonald and walk away. If the Dodgers are desperate enough, let their GM make the mistake. Sure, I would love to have Kemp but I don't want us throwing in Nady, Bay or Marte for him.

That is what I think the Pirates are doing, they are giving Jack the "vote of confidence," but if the Dodgers offer more than he is worth, NH will pull the trigger, and I would be fine with that. Sad, but I would understand.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Jack to be a Dodger if no C.C. deal?
PostPosted: Tue Jul 08, 2008 12:36 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2008 6:11 pm
Posts: 3364
Location: Wheeling, WV
If trading Wilson is blowing up the team, what was the record before he returned to the line up and what is it with him in there. I don't know but my guess is that we have just as high a winning % with as without him.

We need to keep the big picture in mind here. Are we being short sighted by worrying about this year's SS and forgetting that the goal is future growth. While we should not sacrifice this year's team, that's no.2 in the priority list of NH.

Keep your eye on the doughnut not the hole.

_________________
2011 Will Be Our Year -- well make that 2012 (just saying) So it looks like 2013 now - how long must this go on!
THIS IS IT-- NO MORE STREAK!!! *** Finally*** Time to win it in 2014


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 51 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits