Bucfan wrote:
Barrys Dopers wrote:
That's just it, why is there a set budget in play here. We are spending nothing at the MLB level, would 1 or 2 million really hurt? Why can't we sign high end guys in round 1 and 2 AND get the HS kids later???
I understand your point, but the fact of the matter is this: All teams - not just the Pirates - have a budget for the draft. The Pirates spending on draft picks the past two years has been the highest of any team in the majors. The Pirates have signed a number of top-flight players thought to be going to college or returning to college for senior year (Grossman, Miller, Wilson, Von Rosenberg, Dodson, Cain, Inman).
Would I prefer spending zero on Vazquez and using that money to sign Scheppers? Yes, I would. However, the suggestion that the Pirates are not spending on draft picks, or are saving money ala Daniel Moskos/Clint Johnston-type picks is not accurate.
We certainly are not doing anything as bad as the Moskos scenario, but Pounders was not a good pick based on talent by any rating system. Five picks later Detroit drafted Andy Oliver and paid him 1.5 million rather than the slot 670K we paid Brooks. Oliver is now the #4 prospect in their system, Pounders didn't even make our top 30. The next pick after Pounders was Mychel Givens who signed for a just over slot 800k and is now the 9th best prospect for Baltimore and is a high ceiling SS. How else can you explain Pounders at that pick?
BTW, I don't think we spent the most in each draft, I know Boston topped us in 2008 and the Nats last year, I think we were 2nd and 4th the last two drafts.