Proud fans of a 128-year old tradition

It is currently Fri Nov 28, 2014 3:58 am

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:34 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 11:28 pm
Posts: 2170
"As we've tried to evaluate metrically how we've gotten here, you look at the numbers and we weren't supposed to be 16 games over .500. We should have been closer to eight (games), which is still progress. What's happened since Aug. 1, batting averages on balls in play have plummeted for our hitters and increased for our pitchers, especially with runners in scoring position. It doesn't mean it's bad luck, but ... yes, it means it's bad luck."

This guy is such a moron.

_________________
0 straight losing seasons


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:44 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:37 pm
Posts: 567
Ryann wrote:
"As we've tried to evaluate metrically how we've gotten here, you look at the numbers and we weren't supposed to be 16 games over .500. We should have been closer to eight (games), which is still progress. What's happened since Aug. 1, batting averages on balls in play have plummeted for our hitters and increased for our pitchers, especially with runners in scoring position. It doesn't mean it's bad luck, but ... yes, it means it's bad luck."

This guy is such a moron.



And last year was bad luck too? What about the previous 18 years before that? And I suppose the 65% of the time Cutch gets out that is bad luck too? Pffffft.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jun 12, 2008 1:07 pm
Posts: 2596
One bad week could be bad luck. Seven bad weeks is just bad baseball.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 8:26 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 1:37 am
Posts: 15
I blame it on Chase Headley


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:27 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:28 am
Posts: 1087
Tried to evaluate metricly... :ugeek:

What a tool.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Sun Sep 23, 2012 9:37 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:42 pm
Posts: 921
MoTownWV wrote:
Ryann wrote:
"As we've tried to evaluate metrically how we've gotten here, you look at the numbers and we weren't supposed to be 16 games over .500. We should have been closer to eight (games), which is still progress. What's happened since Aug. 1, batting averages on balls in play have plummeted for our hitters and increased for our pitchers, especially with runners in scoring position. It doesn't mean it's bad luck, but ... yes, it means it's bad luck."

This guy is such a moron.



And last year was bad luck too? What about the previous 18 years before that? And I suppose the 65% of the time Cutch gets out that is bad luck too? Pffffft.


Last year was mostly a compound of injuries.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:00 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:16 pm
Posts: 2230
I hear we won today. Too bad it doesn't matter anymore.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:03 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 7:16 pm
Posts: 2230
bad luck? sounds like someone is trying to not shoulder the blame.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:24 am 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 28, 2008 10:46 am
Posts: 3690
Location: Economy, PA
Teams on a roll tend to make their own luck. So do teams that are collapsing.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:39 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:37 pm
Posts: 567
The problem with blaming or crediting luck in baseball is the elements attributed to "luck" are the things that make baseball more than just Money Ball or sabermetrics. If you devalue "luck" in the game as Huntington is doing, you might as well just feed your statistics into a super computer in April and declare the World Series winner based on the output of a simulation.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 12:45 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sat Nov 12, 2011 10:28 am
Posts: 1087
On the Pirates site there is an article where he blames young players trying to do too much so they can stay in the show. What a crock. The oldest players on the team are the failures...other than Burnett.

Starks & NH need to go for sure.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 5181
Location: Washington, DC
doug frobel wrote:
One bad week could be bad luck. Seven bad weeks is just bad baseball.


This.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:38 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:42 pm
Posts: 921
Let me say this. (Minus the stuff that he has said the past few days which sound like crazy talk). Is this really the GM's fault?

I mean he did do the following:

1. Put together a team that was 16 game over .500 in early August.
2. Improved the team at the trade deadline without selling the top prospects.
3. Traded a 28 year old career middle reliever for a 24 year potential power hitter that immediately got on base at a better clip than the RF he replaced.
4. Had the balls to select the top player in the draft and play chicken with Scott Boras and won. (Yes I know we didn't sign him but giving into Boras to me would have been a loss).

Is it the GM's fault that the pitching stopped pitching, the hitting stopped hitting? 3/4 of this season this team played outstanding, how is the GM responsible for the teams attitude that last 1/4 of the season?

Yes he signed Barajas and Barmes but Barmes has been hitting ok the 2nd half and has been hitting really well in September, so we can't put the blame on Clint for the collapse since during the collapse he hasn't sucked. Rod at the plate has been atrocious but our 2 best pitchers prefer him when they pitch so that has to tell you something, plus we were winning games with him batting 200.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:50 pm
Posts: 3879
Location: Glenshaw, PA
rellimie wrote:
Let me say this. (Minus the stuff that he has said the past few days which sound like crazy talk). Is this really the GM's fault?

I mean he did do the following:

1. Put together a team that was 16 game over .500 in early August.
2. Improved the team at the trade deadline without selling the top prospects.
3. Traded a 28 year old career middle reliever for a 24 year potential power hitter that immediately got on base at a better clip than the RF he replaced.
4. Had the balls to select the top player in the draft and play chicken with Scott Boras and won. (Yes I know we didn't sign him but giving into Boras to me would have been a loss).

Is it the GM's fault that the pitching stopped pitching, the hitting stopped hitting? 3/4 of this season this team played outstanding, how is the GM responsible for the teams attitude that last 1/4 of the season?

Yes he signed Barajas and Barmes but Barmes has been hitting ok the 2nd half and has been hitting really well in September, so we can't put the blame on Clint for the collapse since during the collapse he hasn't sucked. Rod at the plate has been atrocious but our 2 best pitchers prefer him when they pitch so that has to tell you something, plus we were winning games with him batting 200.


Yeah I know Rel, its fairly easy to say NH is not a bad GM, its harder to say he's a good GM. That's why I've been on the fence. I do fault him for the collapse, he built this team and hired its manager, its on him. Lack of talent is a system wide issue and NH certainly has deficiencies in some areas. For me it comes down to rolling on with an OK GM (who I think has improved over his tenure) or moving on with a new guy presumably hired to follow the same plan but with better execution. I won't be outraged if NH is kept, but his clock is ticking.

_________________
Well NH did get Cutch signed, but what have you done for me lately?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 5:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 5181
Location: Washington, DC
rellimie wrote:
1. Put together a team that was 16 game over .500 in early August.


I didn't know they gave out division titles, playoff appearances and World Series titles in August. Where do we buy our "16 games over .500 in early August" t-shirts?

Seriously, all that matters is where the team ends up.

rellimie wrote:
2. Improved the team at the trade deadline without selling the top prospects.


Really? He made a couple of moves, but according to numerous sources he could have picked up Chase Headley -- now THAT could have made a huge difference for the team.

rellimie wrote:
3. Traded a 28 year old career middle reliever for a 24 year potential power hitter that immediately got on base at a better clip than the RF he replaced.


Where's the power, my friend? I see a lot of ground balls from Snider, and not a lot of loft to his swing. He certainly doesn't look like a regular, and he's spent a good deal of time riding the pine because of hamstring issues. That move is, at best, a wash for the 2012 season and a risk going forward.

rellimie wrote:
4. Had the balls to select the top player in the draft and play chicken with Scott Boras and won. (Yes I know we didn't sign him but giving into Boras to me would have been a loss).


Huh? What did the Pirates "win"? Nothing more than the 9th overall selection in the 2013 draft. I'd rather have a talented player with a year in the Pirates' system. And I'd rather have seen the Pirates select a few more lesser talents in the first 11 rounds and get Appel to sign for more money. Adding another elite pitcher and potential ace to the system is worth that, in my view. Appel is currently ranked the #1 prospect going into the 2013 draft.

rellimie wrote:
Is it the GM's fault that the pitching stopped pitching, the hitting stopped hitting? 3/4 of this season this team played outstanding, how is the GM responsible for the teams attitude that last 1/4 of the season?


The GM is responsible for the whole, not the parts. And the whole -- at the end of the season -- is likely to be the same as it has been for every other season of the last 20. Losing record and no playoffs.

rellimie wrote:
Yes he signed Barajas and Barmes but Barmes has been hitting ok the 2nd half and has been hitting really well in September, so we can't put the blame on Clint for the collapse since during the collapse he hasn't sucked.


The fact that you're defending the acquisition of Clint Barmes -- at 2 years and $10.5 million -- is utterly ridiculous. It's an awful contract and a waste of money.

rellimie wrote:
Rod at the plate has been atrocious but our 2 best pitchers prefer him when they pitch so that has to tell you something, plus we were winning games with him batting 200.


That's not an endorsement of Rod's ability; it's a credit to the other players on the team. Barajas wasn't worth his contract, either.

List all of Neal Huntington's major league (or close to major league) acquisitions and tell me if you're happy... I can wait.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 5181
Location: Washington, DC
Quick addendum on Travis Snider:

Here's the "masher's" triple slash line with the Bucs -- .248/.323/.333. That ain't good, folks. He's got 7 extra-base hits in 43 games. I don't see a future home run king, particularly given his penchant for pounding the ball into the dirt.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 1:50 pm
Posts: 3879
Location: Glenshaw, PA
J_C_Steel wrote:
Quick addendum on Travis Snider:

Here's the "masher's" triple slash line with the Bucs -- .248/.323/.333. That ain't good, folks. He's got 7 extra-base hits in 43 games. I don't see a future home run king, particularly given his penchant for pounding the ball into the dirt.


As we discussed elsewhere, he was never a ground ball guy before coming here. He's either hurting or they are trying something different with his swing. This staff has such a great track record of getting the most out of players. :roll:

_________________
Well NH did get Cutch signed, but what have you done for me lately?


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 6:24 pm 
Offline
User avatar
 Profile

Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 5:46 pm
Posts: 5181
Location: Washington, DC
Barrys Dopers wrote:
J_C_Steel wrote:
Quick addendum on Travis Snider:

Here's the "masher's" triple slash line with the Bucs -- .248/.323/.333. That ain't good, folks. He's got 7 extra-base hits in 43 games. I don't see a future home run king, particularly given his penchant for pounding the ball into the dirt.


As we discussed elsewhere, he was never a ground ball guy before coming here. He's either hurting or they are trying something different with his swing. This staff has such a great track record of getting the most out of players. :roll:


Good use of emoticon.

I'm just going by what I've seen. I know he hit more fly balls in Toronto. Coincidentally (or not), he also struck out more often in Canada. Maybe it's the cleaner water.

I don't see Travis Snider as a regular starter. That's my point.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 7:42 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 8:42 pm
Posts: 921
Barrys Dopers wrote:
rellimie wrote:
Let me say this. (Minus the stuff that he has said the past few days which sound like crazy talk). Is this really the GM's fault?

I mean he did do the following:

1. Put together a team that was 16 game over .500 in early August.
2. Improved the team at the trade deadline without selling the top prospects.
3. Traded a 28 year old career middle reliever for a 24 year potential power hitter that immediately got on base at a better clip than the RF he replaced.
4. Had the balls to select the top player in the draft and play chicken with Scott Boras and won. (Yes I know we didn't sign him but giving into Boras to me would have been a loss).

Is it the GM's fault that the pitching stopped pitching, the hitting stopped hitting? 3/4 of this season this team played outstanding, how is the GM responsible for the teams attitude that last 1/4 of the season?

Yes he signed Barajas and Barmes but Barmes has been hitting ok the 2nd half and has been hitting really well in September, so we can't put the blame on Clint for the collapse since during the collapse he hasn't sucked. Rod at the plate has been atrocious but our 2 best pitchers prefer him when they pitch so that has to tell you something, plus we were winning games with him batting 200.


Yeah I know Rel, its fairly easy to say NH is not a bad GM, its harder to say he's a good GM. That's why I've been on the fence. I do fault him for the collapse, he built this team and hired its manager, its on him. Lack of talent is a system wide issue and NH certainly has deficiencies in some areas. For me it comes down to rolling on with an OK GM (who I think has improved over his tenure) or moving on with a new guy presumably hired to follow the same plan but with better execution. I won't be outraged if NH is kept, but his clock is ticking.


I'm not trying to defend everything he has done. I also consider him ok, not great but not bad.

My only concern is who replaces him.

I would only want to see 1 of 3 options:

1. Established GM who has done it before.
2. Anyone from the Cardnials system.
3. Anyone from the Rays system.


Top
 
 Post subject: Re: Huntington Blames Slide on Bad Luck
PostPosted: Mon Sep 24, 2012 8:21 pm 
Offline
 Profile

Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 5:37 pm
Posts: 567
I guess my question regarding NH is how long do you give him? He is the one ultimately accountable. He has had 5 yrs now and has yet to produce a winner. Pirate fans don't expect a lot. We don't ask for Championships or even divisional crowns. All we want is a .500 plus season and possibly a wild card bid for now.

Those aren't unreason expectations for any fan base. So how long should he get to meet them?


Top
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 24 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 4 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot] and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group  
Design By Poker Bandits